Morning Meeting
So today we had 15 minutes for announcements and then other 15 minutes for Carmen and Kata to debrief their vow of silence experience. What I got from their dialogue was that we are
Metadialogue
What is matter?
-what is observation
-what is substance
-what is measurement
-what is cosmos?
-what is science?
-what is creation?
Cuales fueron las experiencias que nos hicieron aprender algo concreto esta semana que podamos aplicar en nuestras vidas para convertirnos en la major version de nosotros mismos?
Is God and his creation are coherent?
Por qué queremos imitar al ser humano con tecnologia tal y como es
Que significa superar al ser humano?
What if everything is a program?
Cómo podemos saber si algo es coherente?
What is tacit knowledge of thought?
Cómo podemos sacar provecho de algo, aportando a los demás lo que tenemos dentro?
Qué tanto es necesaria la subjetividad para lograr la objetividad?
Cómo podemos llegar con aproximaciones a algo subjetivo?
Who is the observer, me, God, the universe, and why is it important?
How these questions relate to creating a shared meaning?
Qué pasaría si no existiera el leap of faith?
What is the relation between free fall and free will?
What is intelligence?
Where good ideas come from?
How do the parts relate to the whole?
Why do we give meaning to any content?
Existe la necesidad de creer en Dios?
Qué si Dios no rompe reglas por qué no hay reglas?
How can we measure things that our eyes can’t really see?
What is who?
How can we measure things that our eyes can’t really see?
Leap of faith: cosas que sabemos que son ciertas independientes del exterior, por nuestra experiencia.
La progression de esas preguntas me va a llevar un punto que no podemos responder
Quest for truth starts with a leap of faith, a leap of faith that we can get to the ultimate reality.
Puede tener coherencia como oracion pero no tener meaning.
-what is observation
-what is substance
-what is measurement
-what is cosmos?
-what is science?
-what is creation?
Cuales fueron las experiencias que nos hicieron aprender algo concreto esta semana que podamos aplicar en nuestras vidas para convertirnos en la major version de nosotros mismos?
Is God and his creation are coherent?
Por qué queremos imitar al ser humano con tecnologia tal y como es
Que significa superar al ser humano?
What if everything is a program?
Cómo podemos saber si algo es coherente?
What is tacit knowledge of thought?
Cómo podemos sacar provecho de algo, aportando a los demás lo que tenemos dentro?
Qué tanto es necesaria la subjetividad para lograr la objetividad?
Cómo podemos llegar con aproximaciones a algo subjetivo?
Who is the observer, me, God, the universe, and why is it important?
How these questions relate to creating a shared meaning?
Qué pasaría si no existiera el leap of faith?
What is the relation between free fall and free will?
What is intelligence?
Where good ideas come from?
How do the parts relate to the whole?
Why do we give meaning to any content?
Existe la necesidad de creer en Dios?
Qué si Dios no rompe reglas por qué no hay reglas?
How can we measure things that our eyes can’t really see?
What is who?
How can we measure things that our eyes can’t really see?
Leap of faith: cosas que sabemos que son ciertas independientes del exterior, por nuestra experiencia.
La progression de esas preguntas me va a llevar un punto que no podemos responder
Quest for truth starts with a leap of faith, a leap of faith that we can get to the ultimate reality.
Puede tener coherencia como oracion pero no tener meaning.
Debrief
Our experience during allopoiesis has come from bad to worst. We are not fully mastering Euclid to explain everybody else and make them understand, it has been just a very hard approach and many times instead of facilitating we confuse others. Also our attitude towards Euclid allopoiesis is very disrespectful and not up to our standards. There were 4 people which were completely off and doing other distracting things that affected even more the environment which we were struggling with, conclusion is they were not present in pablito's presentation. It was a big shock for me for the fact that we are almost at the end of our first year in this new environment and culture which was not imposed but emerged from our experience, with it would make more sense that we could easy follow them because we own it, it's completely ours. Our answer to this problem was to truly master the proposition we will be presenting and at least practice it like if you are presenting it to a public. We also talked about having a mega dialogue about all the process we've been through at MPC and the things we want to make it more our own rather than having Bert and Ingrid telling us exactly what they are expecting from us. It should be that they give us a guideline but it is up to us to make it standard or give it a little touch of ourselves and include things we want to see in our curriculum and inspire others to approach it the same way.